Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Seven Words You Can Never Say On Television Or Radio essays

Seven Words You Can Never Say On Television Or Radio essays The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) has started to actively enforce regulations that restrict what can be said on broadcast television and radio. The FCC regulates media that can be received with an antenna, but does not control media broadcasted over cable and satellite. However, the FCC is trying to gain jurisdiction over cable and satellite broadcasting. The Federal Communication Commission is now the court appointed parent to all of the local television and radio stations in the country. And their power is based on seven words. The controversy over using profanity in a public place had begun many years before the FCC banned the use of obscene language on TV and radio. The original debate came to a head in the 1960s when Lenny Bruce became the last person to be arrested for using obscene language in public. Bruce, a satirical comic, used profanity to talk about words in general, and used language that the audience was used to hearing(Penn Bullshit). Lenny Bruce paved the way for the comics today by using offensive speech in a non-offensive way. The major controversy started in 1973 when WBAI, a New York City radio station, played George Carlins eleven and a half minute monologue, Filthy Words. This monologue was an amendment to Carlins original Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television. Acting on the formal complaint of a concerned listener, the FCC declared that the seven dirty words can no longer be said on broadcast television. The Pacifica Foundation, the parent company of WBAI, challenged the declaration. The order was reversed by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, but in 1978 the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the FCC had the jurisdiction to regulate what can and cannot be said on broadcast television and radio. The original seven dirty words are what the FCC uses to base their regulations. ...

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Methodologies essays

Methodologies essays In order to fully understand and synthesize the current state of any culture, one must first seek to understand their past. It is the central tenet of history. We must gain an intellectual grasp of what has already been in order to understand what is and what is to come. However, this is not easy (or even possible) in all situations. The African continent before the 1500s, for instance, has few recorded documents. Therefore, historians must find other ways to understand the lives and values of the various regions of Africa before that time in order to fully understand the roots of Africa and its people as a whole. And while this is certainly no easy task, there are indeed various ways of doing so. To get a cross section of some of these methods, it may be beneficial to look at three in particular; oral tradition, secondary sources, and physical geology. Using these three methodologies as our guideline, we can further understand how history is gathered and garnered not only w ithout the help of written documents in early Africa, but throughout the world. Oral tradition is, at first glance, perhaps the methodology of the three that has the least scientific backing. After all, oral tradition is essential campfire stories that have been passed down from generation to generation, potentially getting organically changed and distorted with each retelling. However, as one may find, oral tradition is just as important to some societies as written works are to others. Everything vital to the proper workings of a society is transmitted by means of written documents in societies with writing and by means of tradition in oral societies. Far from being merely entertainment or folklore, tradition is vested with the essential mission of social reproduction. So we see that a cultures oral tradition may serve for it as a bridge from generation to generation, and therefore we, as historians, may ...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Who are we to play God Dissertation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Who are we to play God - Dissertation Example The wonders of the universe and the miracle of life are becoming more known to our civilization now, more so than at any other point in human history. Developments in scientific reasoning and testing have allowed us to determine the underlying theory of many concepts. Technology has made this more efficient and facilitated some of the discoveries that have been made. In particular, one of the fields, which have been called into question due to a combination of religion, ethics, and politics, is in the field of biological engineering and manipulation.This is due to our high technological advancement in being able to accomplish meticulous processes as well as understanding the theory underlying complex biological processes. Stem cell research has been of high debate in this topic. Progressive society dictates that this is a normal step in treating medical disorders and learning more about how to manipulate biological mechanisms, however at what point does the progressive nature of scie nce override our morality and ethics? Although stem cell research has the possibility of sparking a new revolution in biomedical research, it is still important to recognize that there is a line where science and ethics meet, acknowledging that it is not a line that needs to be crossed. Stem cell research is a look into the future where diseases will be eradicated and a new biological science will develop, however there is controversy dealing with: the pros of research, the negative stigmata and ethical concerns of research, and the future of stem cell research as far as the benefits it can bring. Stem cells are a specific form of cell, which can be encoded to perform almost any function of a cell in the human body. They are hard to harvest due to the fact that as adults, there are very limited quantities of stem cells in the body because they have already differentiated, that is changed into the cell they were needed to function as. For scientists, finding an adequate supply of ste m cells was vital in order to keep the research alive therefore they turned to embryos. Embryos have extremely high counts of stem cells, especially in the early stages. This is due to the fact that as an embryo, the growth is occurring at an accelerated rate. Differentiation of different layers and the formation of all the different organ systems in the body requires a large supply of stem cells in order to serve their function in each of the different systems. The one drawback to the method of harvesting stem cells from human embryos is that usually the infant will not survive or there will be permanent biological damage, which could influence the biological development of the infant in a maladaptive way. Therefore, researchers turned to abortion clinics in order to use aborted fetuses to harvest these cells. This is why the topic of stem cell research is so closely tied to that of the debate of Roe vs. Wade, the argument of prochoice and prolife. Stem cell research in the United States has been extremely restricted by the government. There are only specific institutions and sites where this research can be conducted; federal funding of these projects is also limited. This stigma on stem cell research is having repercussions in the medical and biological research fields. Some scientists devote their life work to that of stem cell research, but are unable to pursue the research adequately here in the United States. Therefore, they leave the United States in order to pursue their research in countries where there are not as many restrictions on stem cell research. As a result, there is an increasingly dangerous hemorrhage in the scientific community as they leave to study in other countries. In addition, private companies have tried to take advantage of this situation by providing funding in these biomedical applications to keep scientists here (Brainard 22-25). However, there are movements in legislature, both state and federal, which are pushing for fewer li mitations in stem cell researc